My dear friend, and future roommate, Henessey wrote this up at the WSUP. If you didn’t already guess, WSUP is our local radio station that I work at. Without delay, I give you the inner workings of a messed up friend.
Rock, Rubber, Scissors
Instead of “Rock, Paper, Scissors” it should be “Rock, Rubber, Scissors” because rock can break scissors and scissors can cut paper BUT paper could not destroy the rock. If it was “Rock, Rubber, Scissors” you could cut rubber with scissors and you could destroy the rock if you used the rubber, like to slingshot and fling the rock into a hard surface which could shatter the rock into pieces. (side note: That’s a run-on sentence, Henessey.) So “ROCK, RUBBER, SCISSORS” BIAOTCH!
OK, OK, Rock, Rubber, Scissors it is… But what do you use for a hand symbol for rubber? - Syffy
I believe the paper symbol could work for rubber. If you don’t think that then feck you! - Henessey
Only, but we need to add something… I’ll only agree if we can add a “Bring!” sound effect -Syffy
No way will this ever work. Small pairs of scissors (I.E. ones the size of a hand) are unable to cut rubber that is the thickness of a hand. So the whole premise of the game is thrown off. Let’s not try to fix things that aren’t broken, shall we? -Anon
As you can see, other people started to reply to his thoughts. I am currently pondering this thought myself. However, I do not think rubber should be the replacement for paper. I do, however, agree that paper isn’t the right object for the game.
What do you think?
Leave a Reply